Langley Research Center

Turbulence Modeling Resource

2D Bump-in-channel Verification Case - Intro Page

The purpose here is to provide a large sequence of nested grids of the same family, along with results from existing CFD codes that employ specific forms of particular turbulence models, in order to help programmers verify their implementations of these same models. On a given grid, there may be differences between the results from different codes, but presumably as the grid is refined the results should approach the same answer (if the flow conditions and boundary conditions are the same). With verification, the purpose is not to establish the "goodness" of a model compared to experiment, but rather to establish that a model has been implemented correctly, as intended according to the equations and boundary conditions. (It is through validation that a model's "goodness" is established.) The purpose here is primarily verification.

The bump-in-channel case is different from the simpler flat plate verification case because it involves wall curvature and, as a result, pressure gradients. It was run at essentially incompressible conditions: M = 0.2, at a Reynolds number of Re = 3 million based on length "1" of the grid. The lower wall is a viscous-wall bump extending from x=0 to 1.5 (the actual bump itself - i.e., non-zero y - is from x=0.3-1.2). The maximum bump height is 0.05. The definition of the bump is:

where "pi"=3.1415927... The upstream and downstream farfield extends 25 chords from the viscous-wall, with symmetry plane BCs imposed on the lower wall between the farfield and the solid wall. The upper boundary is a distance of y=5.0 high. It is taken to be a symmetry plane. The following plots show the layout of this case, along with the boundary conditions. (Note that particular variations of the BCs at the inflow, top wall, and outflow may also work and yield similar results for this problem.)


 
 

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 
 


NASA Langley Research Center
Page Curator and Responsible NASA Official: Chris Rumsey
Privacy Act Statement
Last Updated: 19 May 2009


Feedback on Langley Products and Services